What type of review is characterized by documented procedures and requirements?

The type of review that is characterized by documented procedures and requirements is a formal review. Formal reviews are highly structured processes that follow a predefined methodology, ensuring that all aspects of the review are conducted systematically. They usually involve a specific set of roles, such as a moderator and participants, and require documentation such as review plans, checklists, and formal meeting records.

This structure helps maintain consistency across different reviews and provides a clear framework for evaluating the work, ensuring accountability and traceability. Formal reviews are typically conducted to assess the quality of work products such as requirements, designs, or code against predefined criteria, which is crucial in ensuring quality in software development.

In contrast, informal reviews lack such structured procedures and documentation. Their nature is more casual and can be spontaneous, with no set rules to govern the process. Peer reviews emphasize collaboration among colleagues but still may not have the same level of formalization as a formal review. Technical reviews focus specifically on the technical aspects of a work product but can also vary in their formality.